Federal law gives immigration agents the authority to arrest and detain people believed to have violated immigration law. But everyone — including immigrants suspected of being in the U.S. illegally — ...
For 30 years, law-enforcement officers have been empowered to be “clever”—and that cleverness has today become the cover for ...
SCOTUSblog on MSN
Supreme Court takes up four new cases, including disputes on geofence warrants and Roundup weedkiller
The Supreme Court on Friday afternoon added four new cases, on topics ranging from the Fourth Amendment to federal preemption, to its Oral Argument Docket for the 2025-26 term. The […] The post ...
Opinion
2dOpinion
Immigration officers assert sweeping power to enter homes without a judge's warrant, memo says
A tentative take, on both the rights and the remedies.
The Supreme Court’s review of United States v. Chatrie puts geofence warrants and mass digital data seizures under Fourth Amendment scrutiny, raising urgent questions about particularity, AI-driven ...
Justice Brett Kavanaugh made a case last week for ditching the “shadow docket” label to describe Supreme Court actions. It was an unconvincing case when he made it, and it became even less convincing ...
When can the police enter a person’s home without a warrant? The Fourth Amendment and the various judicial exceptions to it don’t provide a clear answer. But the Supreme Court may provide some clarity ...
Probable cause is important in two aspects of criminal law: Police must have probable cause before they search a person or property, and before they arrest a person. The court must find that there is ...
On October 15, the Supreme Court heard nearly 2.5 hours of oral argument in the Voting Rights Act Case. Without even taking a break, the Court heard the second case, fittingly titled Case v. Montana.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results